[CCWG-ACCT] Your public comment re replacement of IANA provider

[Nigel Roberts]

Thanks for the clarification which helps me resist the perception that 
the Board's is making its own proposal in addition to providing feedback 
on the CCWG proposal.



On 21/09/15 08:57, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
> Hello Paul,
>
>>>     Rather the right question is -- is the Board's proposal the right baseline to start from or is the CCWGs?
>
> The Board was working of the assumption that the CCWG document published for public comment was the base line.
>
> Our comments and recommendations were intended to build on that proposal.    The Board's input  can then be considered along with all the comments provided in the public comment process.   We are participating as one of the stakeholders in the multi-stakeholder process.
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>