[CCWG-ACCT] MEM and enforceability

[Jordan Carter]

Chris asks...

On 25 September 2015 at 12:34, Chris Disspain <ceo at auda.org.au> wrote:

> Thanks Thomas.
>
> But, let's not forget that decisions will not be made by the Community or
> the Single Member, but by the Board. The community powers are limited to
> asking the Board to redo decisions (with the exception of changes of
> Fundamental Bylaws that need approval). The new decision is still to be
> made by the Board. If Board members are of the opinion that the Community
> asks them to do illegal things or things that might expose them to
> liability or just things that are fundamentally wrong, I am sure the Board
> member would not be available for that.
>
>
> And then what?
>
>
>
Well, presumably, that's that. The community would find that any other
director it tried to appoint would find the same constraints, right? And if
the issue isn't a clear cut one which, I suppose, often they aren't, they
could appoint directors with a different view.

And then life goes on....

J
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150925/dcdf9958/attachment.html>