[CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: Kavouss alternative proposal
James Gannon
james at cyberinvasion.net
Sat Sep 26 16:45:53 UTC 2015
But it means we would not have a membership model no?, which would be a huge change.
-James
On 26/09/2015 17:43, "accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Kavouss Arasteh" <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on behalf of kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:
>Dear All
>There is community mechanism through standing Panel
>Pls kindly read the text more carefully
>Kavousd
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 26 Sep 2015, at 09:32, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.NA> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> in short that means, there will be no Community Mechanism.
>>
>> el
>>
>>> On 2015-09-26 09:13 , Jordan Carter wrote:
>>> here is the PDF of Kavouss' suggestion.
>>>
>>> Jordan
>> [...]
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>_______________________________________________
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list