[CCWG-ACCT] Summary of current Board sentiment
avri doria
avri at ella.com
Sun Sep 27 18:48:20 UTC 2015
Hi,
So nothing changed in LA, and any understandings to the contrary are mistaken?
avri
Sent from a T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au> </div><div>Date:09/27/2015 10:48 AM (GMT-08:00) </div><div>To: CCWG Accountability <accountability-cross-community at icann.org> </div><div>Cc: </div><div>Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Summary of current Board sentiment </div><div>
</div>Hello Eberhard,
>> can you please "share your understanding" of what you mean below in the form of an executive summary?
OK - I will try.
- the Board was getting some feedback that it wasn't aligned with the detailed comments that it submitted - so we wanted to confirm that yes the comments we submitted represent our views on the draft proposal, and our suggestions for improvement.
- the Board wanted to be clear that we want to work with the CCWG on a common proposal that we can all support. As Keith noted, this means all including the Board will need to compromise, without compromising our joint goals.
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150927/b2d8b936/attachment.html>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list