[CCWG-ACCT] Communications Ideas

[Matthew Shears]

Hi Stephen

Not being able to review the transcripts yet could you clarify if Larry 
said that specifically or you are interpreting what he said.

That would be very helpful.

Many thanks.

Matthew

On 27/09/2015 17:18, Stephen Deerhake wrote:
> It's not just the Board; it was clear to me from Larry's remarks that the
> NTIA will not buy into a member model either.  And if they aren't buying
> into it, it will not happen.
>
> Cheers.
> Stephen Deerhake
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of
> Malcolm Hutty
> Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 12:16 PM
> To: Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net>;
> accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Communications Ideas
>
>
>
> On 27/09/2015 15:48, Nigel Roberts wrote:
>> Unless the community give up the idea of ICANN having members (whether
>> one or seven billion) the Board will not agree a common proposal.
> I wish I had been able to attend the face-to-face meeting.
>
> Were the Board able to be any more clear as to why they insist on the
> community giving up on the idea of having at least a single member?
>
>

-- 

Matthew Shears
Director - Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology
mshears at cdt.org
+ 44 771 247 2987


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus