[CCWG-ACCT] Work plan to Dublin

[Thomas Rickert]

Hello Avri,
thanks for your input. You will remember we discussed in preparation for LA that we wanted to avoid a battle of models. This is why we did not put that specific point on the agenda. Rather, we wanted to discuss the comments and try to remove concerns.

Surely, the meeting did not go as smoothly as I am sure we all hoped. Nonetheless, I think we made good progress in some areas, particularly with the break-out sessions.

Please do comment on and ask for changes to the agendas we suggest to the group.

Best,
Thomas

> Am 28.09.2015 um 19:14 schrieb Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> By and large looks reasonable.
> 
> on slide 7
> 
>> co-ordination by new small group (SO/AC reps, Board, Lawyers, ) to
>> limit risk of friction, no decision making.
> 
> While seeing this as possibly useful, I would also hope to minimize the
> amount of topic framing and agenda setting done by this smaller
> authoritative group.
> 
> Which points to another issue, which is the degree to which the agendas
> for meetings are not subject to participant review and especially that
> the opening of the meeting does not give the participants the ability to
> amend the agenda.  While I respect the difficulty of the problems the
> chairs must deal with, I do believe that they have been a  bit too
> autocratic at times and that this has, perhaps, interfered with our
> ability to resolve issues.  For example the fact that we were prevented
> from discussing the implications of the competing models in this last
> F2F meeting have left us with unexplored fundamental disagreements and
> questions that should have been asked.
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> On 28-Sep-15 12:47, Mathieu Weill wrote:
>> Dear Colleagues,
>> 
>> In anticipation of a discussion during our meeting tomorrow, please
>> find attached a set of slides to suggest a way forward, for the
>> group's consideration.
>> 
>> Thank you for your feedbacks.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Thomas, Leon & Mathieu
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150928/1a55ec0e/signature.asc>