[CCWG-ACCT] Communications Ideas

[Greg Shatan]

Super Community Unification Model?

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net> wrote:

>
>
> > On 28 Sep 2015, at 20:06, Kieren McCarthy <kieren at kierenmccarthy.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > * Last suggestion: stop calling it the "single member model". Call it
> something that makes immediate sense to everyone and has a positive feel to
> it. That way people can understand it. And you give the Board a way to save
> face.
>
> Kieran,
>
> Thank you for your thoughtful professional advice. We would do well to
> follow it. On the except I quote above, though, do you have a suggested
> alternative?
>
> The advantage of the term "Single Member Model" is that it is clearly
> states i) it is a membership model and ii) there is only one member. That
> has a certain frank simplicity compared to, say, the "super re-empowered
> community inclusivity model"; anything else that comes across as a
> collection of buzzwords is unlikely to be more convincing.
>
> Malcolm.
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150928/95cacc10/attachment.html>