[CCWG-ACCT] CSMM as WS2

Chris Disspain ceo at auda.org.au
Tue Sep 29 00:42:34 UTC 2015


Thanks Jonathan.

I find RFC 1925 most instructive when dealing with circumstances such as the one we currently find ourselves in.

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1925.txt <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1925.txt> 


Cheers,

Chris

> On 29 Sep 2015, at 09:29 , Jonathan Zuck <jzuck at actonline.org> wrote:
> 
> Here's a flyer. How about we make the determination that converting ICANN to a membership organization is a WS2 initiative and design a stress test for whatever we come up with in the interim that examines the community's ability to make this transformation post transition. With the right set of bylaws changes, the ability to spill the board, etc. we might be able to meet the WS1 requirements of "sufficient leverage to accomplish WS2." We could keep it pretty simple, eliminate the deadline, the NTIA, etc. and work towards a membership model over the following year and spill the board if they resist. I know that spilling the board is something we don't regard as practical leverage for some random policy decision but I think it's pretty credible for a restructuring. Thoughts?
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150929/f78e10fb/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list