[CCWG-ACCT] Work plan to Dublin

[Robin Gross]

Thanks, Mathieu, for this helpful proposal.  I've got a couple questions for clarifications about some statements on the slides.

1.  On slide 7, the last one, on point 2 it says "Ensure that Board briefings on CCWG are (also) provided by CCWG co-chairs".  Does this mean those briefings will be provided to CCWG members via the co-chairs?  Or was the "by" meant to be a "to" in that statement (or something else)?  It wasn't quite clear to me.

2.  Also on slide 7, point 4 on the substantive work of the sub-teams (sub-part 2) "coordination by new small group (SO/AC reps, Board, Lawyers) to limit friction, no decision-making".  Presumably this means the SO/AC reps appointed to CCWG.  But which "board" members and which "lawyers" are proposed to coordinate the sub-teams in this new small group?

Thanks much!

Best,
Robin

On Sep 28, 2015, at 9:47 AM, Mathieu Weill wrote:

> Dear Colleagues,
> 
> In anticipation of a discussion during our meeting tomorrow, please find attached a set of slides to suggest a way forward, for the group's consideration.
> 
> Thank you for your feedbacks.
> 
> Best regards,
> Thomas, Leon & Mathieu
> <To Dublin and beyond.pdf>_______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150928/0714a745/signature.asc>