[CCWG-ACCT] CSMM as WS2

Greg Shatan gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Tue Sep 29 01:30:27 UTC 2015


All truth is said in jest.

On Monday, September 28, 2015, avri doria <avri at ella.com> wrote:

> Hmm. An April 1 RFC as a model solution for our issues with the board.
> Might indeed be the right approach.
>
> Or was that just by way of comment. For example an explanation of why
> putting things in ws2 is just silly and won't work.
>
>
> avri
>
> Sent from a T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Chris Disspain <ceo at auda.org.au
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ceo at auda.org.au');>>
> Date:09/28/2015 8:42 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: Jonathan Zuck <jzuck at actonline.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jzuck at actonline.org');>>
> Cc: CCWG Accountability <accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','accountability-cross-community at icann.org');>>
>
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CSMM as WS2
>
> Thanks Jonathan.
>
> I find RFC 1925 most instructive when dealing with circumstances such as
> the one we currently find ourselves in.
>
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1925.txt
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Chris
>
> On 29 Sep 2015, at 09:29 , Jonathan Zuck <jzuck at actonline.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jzuck at actonline.org');>> wrote:
>
> Here's a flyer. How about we make the determination that converting ICANN
> to a membership organization is a WS2 initiative and design a stress test
> for whatever we come up with in the interim that examines the community's
> ability to make this transformation post transition. With the right set of
> bylaws changes, the ability to spill the board, etc. we might be able to
> meet the WS1 requirements of "sufficient leverage to accomplish WS2." We
> could keep it pretty simple, eliminate the deadline, the NTIA, etc. and
> work towards a membership model over the following year and spill the board
> if they resist. I know that spilling the board is something we don't regard
> as practical leverage for some random policy decision but I think it's
> pretty credible for a restructuring. Thoughts?
>
> Jonathan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org');>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150928/4894518c/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list