[CCWG-ACCT] Work plan to Dublin

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Mathieu
Pls carefully read my earlier message ,
I hope you are not acting like your co-chair not listening to the
participants
I AM STRONGLY AGAINST CREATING A SMALL  CLOSED GROUP to discuss any issue
what so ever.
The CCWG Chater is quite clear. The community has given a rtasks to us to
discuss openly freely and transparently.
THE CHARTER THEREFORE DOES NOT SPEAK OF ANY CLOSED GROUP.
If the CCWG and not Co-chair reach at a consensus that another group
shouléd be  formed to discuss the issue Under consideration with a view to
find a way forward ,taking into account all inputs ( ccwg second Prooposal
, Public Comments, Board,s proposal and the report of LA meeting) that
groupm MUST BE OPEN TO EVERY BODY AND WE SHOULD AGREE ON ITS CHAIR OR
CO-CHAIR.
tHE ICANN process MUST BE OPEN, INCLUSSIVE, TRANSPARENT AND DEMOCRATIC.
Pls kindly be careful and advoid creating a hiden/ closed cgroup
Regards
Kavouss

2015-09-29 11:50 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>:

> Dear Robin,
>
> Thank you for your quick feedback. I try to clarify below.
>
> Le 29/09/2015 00:10, Robin Gross a écrit :
>
>> Thanks, Mathieu, for this helpful proposal.  I've got a couple questions
>> for clarifications about some statements on the slides.
>>
>> 1.  On slide 7, the last one, on point 2 it says "Ensure that Board
>> briefings on CCWG are (also) provided by CCWG co-chairs".  Does this mean
>> those briefings will be provided to CCWG members via the co-chairs?  Or was
>> the "by" meant to be a "to" in that statement (or something else)?  It
>> wasn't quite clear to me.
>>
> This sentence is probably confusing. It might be expressed more clearly in
> the correspondence to Steve Crocker :
>
>> 3.    At the same time, we reiterate our proposal to provide, as
>> co-chairs, regular Board briefings during the Board meetings dedicated to
>> Accountability, alongside the briefings provided by the President and
>> staff. We would also welcome the opportunity to review the briefing
>> materials received by Board members, and would understand if that was
>> subject to a non disclosure agreement.
>>
> So it was related to the briefings *of* the Board *by* CCWG.
>
> I hope this clarifies ?
>
>>
>> 2.  Also on slide 7, point 4 on the substantive work of the sub-teams
>> (sub-part 2) "coordination by new small group (SO/AC reps, Board, Lawyers)
>> to limit friction, no decision-making".  Presumably this means the SO/AC
>> reps appointed to CCWG.  But which "board" members and which "lawyers" are
>> proposed to coordinate the sub-teams in this new small group?
>>
> That is a good topic for discussion. At this point, this had been drawn
> from Ira Magaziner's suggestion to coordinate more closely within the
> leadership of the various groups.
>
> Best,
> Mathieu
>
>> Thanks much!
>>
>> Best,
>> Robin
>>
>> On Sep 28, 2015, at 9:47 AM, Mathieu Weill wrote:
>>
>> Dear Colleagues,
>>>
>>> In anticipation of a discussion during our meeting tomorrow, please find
>>> attached a set of slides to suggest a way forward, for the group's
>>> consideration.
>>>
>>> Thank you for your feedbacks.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Thomas, Leon & Mathieu
>>> <To Dublin and beyond.pdf>_______________________________________________
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>
>>
> --
> *****************************
> Mathieu WEILL
> AFNIC - directeur général
> Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
> mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
> Twitter : @mathieuweill
> *****************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150929/4722dc0d/attachment.html>