[CCWG-ACCT] ICANN doesn't "allocate" or "assign" beyond the root (was Re: CCWG - Proposed Responses to questions on Draft Bylaws)

[Jordan Carter]

I agree with Andrew and Milton et al.

Jordan

On 11 April 2016 at 15:17, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:

> Agree 100%, this really is a mission-critical issue, to coin a phrase.
> This is not a quibble over phrasing.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > The current bylaw language quite clearly says not only that ICANN can
> make
> > such a rule, but that making rules of this sort is part of ICANN's
> mission.  By
> > restricting the policy making throughout the tree to the contractual
> > relationships ICANN actually has, we stop making this about where in the
> DNS
> > the name appears and turn it into a normal contractual obligation.  This
> gets
> > away from the notion of ICANN-as-regulator.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>



-- 
Jordan Carter

Chief Executive
*InternetNZ *

+64-4-495-2118 (office) | +64-21-442-649 (mob) | Skype: jordancarter
jordan at internetnz.net.nz | www.internetnz.nz

*A better world through a better Internet*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160411/bf78fb0f/attachment-0001.html>