[CCWG-ACCT] TR: [bylaws-coord] Requested clarification of Question 29; further clarification request for Question 7
Dr Eberhard W Lisse
el at lisse.NA
Wed Apr 13 09:27:04 UTC 2016
The first sentence is incorrect.
Even valid arguments can be opposed, and are being opposed. All the
time. Even by Mr Arasteh's employer, as a matter of fact.
That's why there is discussion/negotiation. Often not the most valid
argument prevails, but the least invalid :-)-O. And of course often
also the ones made by the most skilled negotiators or the ones backed
by the most powerful.
I am not commenting on the second sentence.
el
On 2016-04-12 21:16, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> Opposing to valid argument is identical to opposing discussion
> .what was done last night is clear evidence of opposing to a healthy
> discussion
[...]
--
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421 \ /
Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list