[CCWG-ACCT] .Africa Preliminary Injunction

[Seun Ojedeji]

Isn't it interesting that a US court is able to determine that delegating
.Africa is harmful to Africa internet users even though AU affirms
otherwise.

Things like this is what makes some to always raise ICANN jurisdiction
issue. Nevertheless, I will recognise the fact that any other jurisdiction
court could also act in a similar manner.

That said, I had thought there would be indications on what date the next
hearing will be (to ascertain the supposed fairness)

Regards
Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On 13 Apr 2016 5:03 p.m., "Nigel Roberts" <nigel at channelisles.net> wrote:

> The 'public interest' is exactly what it says.. The global public.
>
> He refers SPECIFICALLY to the African internet users' public interest in
> the judgment.
>
>
> As follows:
>
> On balance, the Court finds it more prejudicial to
>> the African community, and the international community in general, if the
>> delegation of .Africa is made
>> prior to a determination on the fairness of the process by which it was
>> delegated.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160413/76752027/attachment.html>