[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG - Bylaws Drafting - Answers to some of the remaining questions.

[Tijani BEN JEMAA]

Bernard,

I’m sorry, but what was discussed and adopted is that the bylaws should mention that the rule of procedure will address the duration of the IRP consideration if under certain circonstances, this duration exceeds the pre-defined 6 months. 

Thank you for your cooperation

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tijani BEN JEMAA
Executive Director
Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)
Phone: +216 98 330 114
            +216 52 385 114
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


> Le 14 avr. 2016 à 21:17, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> All,
> 
> The CCWG leadership met on April 14th to consider the CCWG responses to the remaining open questions (including re-framing of Q33 by R.Fei in her email)
> 
> Please find attached the answers to all remaining questions except the following:
> 
> Additional Question 12 (Mission and Regulation) is pending a response from lawyers on alternatives proposed by BBurr
> Additional question 14 on Section 1.1 (d) will require a special meeting as discussed at the CCWG meeting of 12 April.
> Bernard Turcotte
> ICANN Staff Support for the
> CCWG Co-Chairs Thomas Rickert, Mathieu Weill, Leon Snachez
> 
> 
> <CCWG Pending Questions for Bylaws Coordination Group - Post April 14 - Answers to some remaining questions V1.docx>_______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160415/9b06e295/attachment.html>