[CCWG-ACCT] TR: [bylaws-coord] Explanation of grandfathered agreements

[Chartier, Mike S]

Isn't the meeting required prior to finalizing the bylaws?
Is there a new timeline for publishing the public review?

-----Original Message-----
From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mathieu Weill
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 4:29 PM
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>
Cc: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] TR: [bylaws-coord] Explanation of grandfathered agreements

Dear Alissa,

The meeting has not taken place yet. We have requested availability information from Icann Legal, but have not received a response yet, most probably because of the rush to finalize the bylaws.

The meeting is planned to be announced on this list of course.

Best
Mathieu

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Alissa Cooper [mailto:alissa at cooperw.in] Envoyé : mercredi 20 avril 2016 21:46 À : Mathieu Weill Cc : accountability-cross-community at icann.org
Objet : Re: [CCWG-ACCT] TR: [bylaws-coord] Explanation of grandfathered agreements

Does the circulation of this memo mean that the meeting of parties interested in this issue (discussed on the April 12 CCWG call and noted in Bernard’s April 14 email) took place already? Are there minutes or a transcript available from that meeting?

Thanks,
Alissa

> On Apr 20, 2016, at 3:14 AM, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr> wrote:
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> Please find attached a memo from our lawyers, in response to our 
> request regarding Section 1.1 (d) of the Bylaws (so called 
> "grandfathering"
> provisions).
>
> Best,
> Mathieu
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : bylaws-coord-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:bylaws-coord-bounces at icann.org] De la part de Rosemary E. Fei 
> Envoyé : mercredi 20 avril 2016 10:05 À : bylaws-coord at icann.org Cc :
> ICANN-Adler; Daniel Halloran (daniel.halloran at icann.org); Sidley ICANN 
> CCWG (sidleyicannccwg at sidley.com); Amy Stathos
> (amy.stathos at icann.org)
> Objet : [bylaws-coord] Explanation of grandfathered agreements
>
> Dear Bylaws Coordination Group:
>
> During the CCWG call on April 12, Mathieu noted that, in order to 
> approve the proposed Bylaws, the CCWG would need an explanation for 
> the unanimous decision among the Sidley and Adler firms and ICANN 
> Legal to include specified agreements and the current Strategic and 
> Operating Plans in the list of "grandfathered" documents in Section
> 1.1(d)(ii) of the draft Bylaws circulated on April 7, 2016.  The 
> explanation, approved by all three counsels, is attached, in Word and 
> pdf formats.  Please distribute to the full CCWG list, if you deem 
> that appropriate.
>
> Please let us know if you need any further information on this point.
>
> Rosemary, Holly, and John
> <Explanation of Grandfathering Provisions at Section 
> 1.doc><Explanation of grandfathered agreements 
> (00788389xA3536).pdf><Pièce jointe sans titre 
> 02233.txt>_______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list 
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community