[CCWG-ACCT] Jurisdiction Proposed Questions and Poll Results

John Laprise jlaprise at gmail.com
Mon Dec 19 15:40:20 UTC 2016


I don't think the ILO is analogous. It doesn't make policy/enter into
contractual relationships in the same way that ICANN does. 

 

Best regards, 

 

John Laprise, Ph.D.

Consulting Scholar

 

 <http://www.linkedin.com/in/jplaprise/>
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jplaprise/

 

 

 

From: Marilyn Cade [mailto:marilynscade at hotmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 9:34 AM
To: John Laprise <jlaprise at gmail.com>; 'parminder'
<parminder at itforchange.net>; accountability-cross-community at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Jurisdiction Proposed Questions and Poll Results

 

John, I may be wrong, but I think that perhaps ILO?

 

  _____  

From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>
<accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> > on behalf of
John Laprise <jlaprise at gmail.com <mailto:jlaprise at gmail.com> >
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 9:44 AM
To: 'parminder'; accountability-cross-community at icann.org
<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org> 
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Jurisdiction Proposed Questions and Poll Results 

 

Possibilities of jurisdictional immunity? Could you please provide examples
of organizations that enjoy such.

 

Best regards, 

 

John Laprise, Ph.D.

Consulting Scholar

 

 <http://www.linkedin.com/in/jplaprise/>
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jplaprise/

 

 

 

From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>
[mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of
parminder
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 7:10 AM
To: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org> 
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Jurisdiction Proposed Questions and Poll Results

 

 

 

On Saturday 17 December 2016 12:40 AM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:

SNIP 
John Laprise's wording was much, much better: 
"What are the advantages or disadvantages, if any, relating to changing
ICANN's jurisdiction*, particularly with regard to the actual operation of
ICANN's policies and accountability mechanisms?"


This formulation does not include possibilities of jurisdictional immunity. 

Something like 



"What are the advantages or disadvantages, if any, relating to changing
ICANN's jurisdiction*, or providing possible jurisdictional immunity,
particularly with regard to the actual operation of ICANN's policies and
accountability mechanisms?"


would be better.

parminder 

 
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org> 
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20161219/73eeed5e/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list