[CCWG-ACCT] Notice of polling of members on Recommendation 11 at the next meeting of the CCWG February 2nd 06:00UTC
Dr Eberhard W Lisse
el at lisse.NA
Mon Feb 1 09:29:14 UTC 2016
If we come up with multiple different proposals and put these to the
vote/poll, we will exclude the Participants because only the
Members are polling/voting.
"In appointing their members, the chartering organizations
should note that the CCWG-Accountability's decision-making
methodologies require that CCWG-Accountability members act by
consensus, and that polling will only be used in rare
instances and with the recognition that such polls do not
"In a rare case, the chair(s) may decide that the use of a
poll is reasonable to assess the level of support for a
recommendation. However, care should be taken in using polls
that they do not become votes, as there are often
disagreements about the meanings of the poll questions or of
the poll results."
I do not have a concern about polling about the current 2/3 proposal.
I personally am comfortable with the 60% solution, if it gets a Public
On 2016-02-01 09:17, Greg Shatan wrote:
> We are only "polling," not "voting."
> It seems, however, that the poll will have the same effect as a
> vote, to the extent the effect is discernible from the Chairs'
> On Monday, February 1, 2016, Dr Eberhard W Lisse
> <epilisse at gmail.com> wrote:
> That would be change our working method to voting, wouldn't it?
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421 \ /
Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community