[CCWG-ACCT] The 60 percent solution
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Mon Feb 1 05:06:57 UTC 2016
Indeed. Thanks to both and I am pretty sure that the ALAC would support this.
Although this is not a Seven-Per-Cent Solution, it may well be the
only answer left once we have eliminated all the others! *
* If you don't understand that comment, either ignore it or see
At 31/01/2016 07:30 PM, Drazek, Keith wrote:
>Thanks to Kavouss for this suggestion, and to Greg for highlighting
>it. I hope we can all consider this as a possible further compromise
>solution that might bring us to resolution. I know we are all
>committed to the successful completion of our work in a timely
>manner. Let's not miss this opportunity to reach consensus and
>finish our work in a collaborative manner.
>Regards to all.
>On Jan 31, 2016, at 6:49 PM, Greg Shatan
><<mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
>>I wanted to pluck this suggestion out of the email swamp.
>>Kavouss made an alternative proposal concerning another threshold
>>between Simple Majority and 2/3 -- the alternative threshold is 60%.
>>Speaking only for myself, this could be a simple but creative way
>>out of the current situation. It is a literally a middle ground
>>between the current majority threshold and the previously proposed
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community