[CCWG-ACCT] The 60 percent solution
Phil Buckingham
phil at dotadvice.co.uk
Mon Feb 1 15:26:42 UTC 2016
Dear Kavouss,
Thank you for your compromise proposal/ solution. The CCWG really does need
to get over this huge hurdle.
I am struggling to keep to up.
In preparation for the call tomorrow , could you/ Co Chairs summarise your
and Becky ' alternative recommendation. The key question to me is which is
easier to implement and the simplest to understand.
Many thanks,
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of
Kavouss Arasteh
Sent: 01 February 2016 13:35
To: Schaefer, Brett
Cc: acct-staff at icann.org; Thomas Rickert; CCWG Accountability
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] The 60 percent solution
Dear Brett
I think it id more straight forward to take 60% than Becky ,s proposal not
because mine is better but more simpler.
Regards
I appeal to you and your distinguished colleagues as well as Becky to
kindly consider 60% with favourable thought Kavouss
Sent from my iPhone
> On 1 Feb 2016, at 13:21, Schaefer, Brett <Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org>
wrote:
>
> I'm a bit confused. Wouldn't the arguments against the 2/3 requirement,
which is after all 66%, apply just as much to the 60% proposal?
>
> I think Becky's proposal gets much closer to addressing the substance of
the concerns raised.
>
>
> ________________________________
> Brett Schaefer
> Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs
> Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National
> Security and Foreign Policy The Heritage Foundation
> 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
> Washington, DC 20002
> 202-608-6097
> heritage.org<http://heritage.org/>
>
> On Jan 31, 2016, at 6:50 PM, Greg Shatan
<gregshatanipc at gmail.com<mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I wanted to pluck this suggestion out of the email swamp.
>
> Kavouss made an alternative proposal concerning another threshold between
Simple Majority and 2/3 -- the alternative threshold is 60%.
>
> Speaking only for myself, this could be a simple but creative way out of
the current situation. It is a literally a middle ground between the
current majority threshold and the previously proposed 2/3 threshold:
>
> Votes
>
> Percentage
>
> Result
>
> 8/16
>
> 50%
>
> No
>
> 9/16
>
> 56.25%
>
> Yes, by majority
>
> 10/16
>
> 62.50%
>
> Yes, if by 60%
>
> 11/16
>
> 68.75%
>
> Yes, if by 2/3
>
>
> This would require one more vote than the current threshold and one less
vote than the 2/3 threshold. Win/win?
>
> Greg
>
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Kavouss Arasteh
<kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com<mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Dear Co-Chairs
> Pls kindly confirm that you have received my last alternative proposal
> concerning another threshold between Simple Majority and 2/3. This
> alternative threshould is 60% There has been many cases considered
> with that level of threshold Pls confirm its recption and confirm
> actions to be taken before you go to poll Awaiting for your reply
> Kavouss
>
>
> [...]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-C
> ommunity at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community<h
> ttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-C
> ommunity at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community<h
> ttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-C
> ommunity at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list