[CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 11, 2/3 board threshold, GAC consensus, and finishing

Paul Rosenzweig paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
Mon Feb 1 18:15:31 UTC 2016


OK ... I'll give up too.  The IRP handed the Board its most severe rebuke in
living memory for acting on improper GAC advice and you seem content with
that ....

Paul Rosenzweig
paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com 
O: +1 (202) 547-0660
M: +1 (202) 329-9650
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
Link to my PGP Key



-----Original Message-----
From: Eric (Maule) Brunner-Williams [mailto:ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net] 
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2016 12:55 PM
To: Paul Rosenzweig <paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com>
Cc: 'Eric (Maule) Brunner-Williams' <ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net>; 'Kavouss
Arasteh' <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>;
accountability-cross-community at icann.org
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 11, 2/3 board threshold, GAC
consensus, and finishing

> As I said, it was not my conclusion but that of the IRP.  I am sure 
> you can read that decision ....

I give up. You can't point to an act, or a failure to act, by the GAC, yet
you claim it interfered, and the basis for your assertion is that someone
else said so.

Eric Brunner-Williams
Eugene, Oregon



More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list