[CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 11, 2/3 board threshold, GAC consensus, and finishing

Paul Rosenzweig paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
Tue Feb 2 14:32:18 UTC 2016


I agree with Andrew.  Logically, there is no reason they are mutually
exclusive.  Politically, they are quite interdependent.  For some the
willingness to accept 60% might very well be contingent on Becky's proposal
being adopted.  

Paul

Paul Rosenzweig
paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com 
O: +1 (202) 547-0660
M: +1 (202) 329-9650
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066


-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Sullivan [mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 9:20 AM
To: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 11, 2/3 board threshold, GAC
consensus, and finishing

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:14:31AM +0100, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> THESE TWO PROPOSALS ARE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE.

This is a new wrinkle.  I don't see how it's true.  Becky's proposal is
completely compatible with 50%+1, 60% (+1?), 2/3, or even 100% thresholds
for the board's support.  Can you please explain why you think they are
mutually exclusive?

Best regards,

A


--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community



More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list