[CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 11, 2/3 board threshold, GAC consensus, and finishing

[Malcolm Hutty]

On 02/02/2016 14:26, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>> The addition of the following text might help allieviate that concern:
>>
>> "This clause does not create a presumption that the Board shall accept
>> such advice, or change the criteria for how it shall be evaluated."
> 
> I'm a little uncomfortable with all the ways the document keeps
> growing descriptions of what it is not. 

Fair enough. I'm sure it can be stated in a positive fashion; I didn't
expect this to be final bylaws text anyway.

Can we agree the principle that we're only changing the voting threshold
and not trying to create a new presumption of obedience, and leave it to
the lawyers to come up with the best language to avoid any unintended
consequences?

Malcolm.

-- 
            Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
   Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
 London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/

                 London Internet Exchange Ltd
       Monument Place, 24 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AJ

         Company Registered in England No. 3137929
       Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA