[CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 11, 2/3 board threshold, GAC consensus, and finishing
kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Tue Feb 2 16:22:23 UTC 2016
Pls read my three/ mails
Either lowering threshold or considering Becky, s editorially amended alternative in a mutually exclusive manner .
Or you propose to just considering 60% threshold and forget about Becky, proposal.
I totally disagree to consider both as complementary proposal since the discussion on call 81 was just about two thresholds; Simple majority or 2/3 . Then the 60% was proposed as a compromise.
Pls read my several messages in this regard
Sent from my iPhone
> On 2 Feb 2016, at 16:58, Burr, Becky <Becky.Burr at neustar.biz> wrote:
> J. Beckwith Burr
> Neustar, Inc. / Deputy
> General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer
> 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington D.C. 20006
> Office: +1.202.533.2932 Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 / neustar.biz
>> On 2/2/16, 10:55 AM, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 03:17:23PM +0000, Malcolm Hutty wrote:
>>> Can we agree the principle that we're only changing the voting threshold
>>> and not trying to create a new presumption of obedience
>> I do not actually see how the presumption worry is motivated, but I
>> don't care enough about this to argue. If it will make us go faster,
>> I'm in favour; if it adds even one millisecond additional time to
>> completion, I'm opposed.
>> Best regards,
>> Andrew Sullivan
>> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community