[CCWG-ACCT] ICANN Board comments on Recommendation 9 – AoC Reviews

[Kavouss Arasteh]

The clarification given by Bruce in both areas seem legitimate, in
particular, that any Voting would 7should only be limited to Team  Memebrs
AND not TO pARTICIPANTS OR oBSERVERS. tHIS WHAT ccwg ALSO DOES IN CASE OF
VOTING.
Regards
Kavouss

2016-02-04 8:40 GMT+01:00 Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>:

> Recommendation 9 – AoC Reviews
>
> Following on from the recent email exchange to clarify the Board’s
> concerns on Recommendation 9, the Board notes that many of its concerns can
> be addressed during implementation and the development of Operational
> Standards.  The Board has a particular concern with two paragraphs in the
> most recent version.
>
> At paragraph 54, the Board does not support the language that states
> “Review Teams are established to include both a limited number of members
> and an open number of participants.”  The Board would support this language
> if it read “Review Teams are established to include both a limited number
> of members and an open number of observers.”  The Board does not agree with
> a Bylaws-mandated inclusion of “participants” in these Review Teams.  The
> Review Team composition is defined and limited because of the specificity
> of the review.  Requiring open participation is not consistent with this
> purpose.
>
> Similarly, the statement at Paragraph 57 that the Review Team would first
> try to find consensus among “participants”, and only if that is not
> successful, seek consensus among members.  Consensus polling should only be
> among the Review Team members.  The Board does not support maintaining “if
> consensus cannot be reached among the participants” at the beginning of
> that paragraph.
>
> Regards,
>
> ICANN Board Liaison to the CCWG
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160204/69784201/attachment.html>