[CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 6 and a way forward to include compromise text suggested by the Board
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Fri Feb 5 16:38:12 UTC 2016
I think that we want a chartering process comparable to that of the
CCWG. I presume that if a HR group were to come into existence and
was not chartered by a reasonable number of orgs, then the Board
would not agree to the "semi-binding" nature of the outcomes (forgive
me inventing a new word to describe the CCWG-Board process previously
At 05/02/2016 01:52 AM, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
> >> I don't understand the concept of a Cross Community WG
> chartered by only one AC/SO.
>Good pick up. Might be best described as "two or more", or "at
>least three" if you want a minimum threshold.
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community