[CCWG-ACCT] Responses to Rafael's Questions
james at cyberinvasion.net
Sat Feb 6 20:02:13 UTC 2016
I just want to reach to this and note that ALAC and At-Large members are very active in the GNSO policy development processes on equal footing with GNSO members. SO unless I am missing something I don’t think that this is reflective of the current realities for the GNSO policy processes.
On 06/02/2016, 7:37 p.m., "accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Eric (Maule) Brunner-Williams" <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on behalf of ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net> wrote:
>We have struggled over the years with the problem that the GAC, and also
>ALAC, have no structural means of participating in policy development (in
>any of the SOs), and so are constrained to react to policy proposals.
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community