[CCWG-ACCT] Responses to Rafael's Questions

[James Gannon]

ALAC and At-large members of GNSO PDPs are given exactly the same rights during the working group and the final determination of consensus as members of the WG affiliated with the GNSO…
Im not sure of any differentiation in the current working methods of GNSO PDPs. And for the record and for Eric’s info GAC members in particular the PSWG members are also active in a similar manner.
But I agree with Seun here is not the place for this discussion given the current pressing matter we have before us.
-James

From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com<mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>>
Date: Saturday 6 February 2016 at 8:19 p.m.
To: James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net<mailto:james at cyberinvasion.net>>
Cc: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com>>, "accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>" <accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>>, "Eric (Maule) Brunner-Williams" <ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net<mailto:ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net>>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Responses to Rafael's Questions


FWIW I don't know what gives you that impression but yes no doubt about the activeness of ALAC (AtLarge) but I think adding "equal footing" to it may be too optimistic.
That said, I don't think this is where to resolve that (if there is anything to resolve)

Cheers!

On 6 Feb 2016 9:02 p.m., "James Gannon" <james at cyberinvasion.net<mailto:james at cyberinvasion.net>> wrote:
I just want to reach to this and note that ALAC and At-Large members are very active in the GNSO policy development processes on equal footing with GNSO members. SO unless I am missing something I don’t think that this is reflective of the current realities for the GNSO policy processes.

-James




On 06/02/2016, 7:37 p.m., "accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Eric (Maule) Brunner-Williams" <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net<mailto:ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net>> wrote:

>We have struggled over the years with the problem that the GAC, and also
>ALAC, have no structural means of participating in policy development (in
>any of the SOs), and so are constrained to react to policy proposals.
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160206/0129951d/attachment-0001.html>