[CCWG-ACCT] Time to make a decision (was Re: Responses to Rafael's Questions)

Schaefer, Brett Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org
Sat Feb 6 21:06:19 UTC 2016


Agree Keith.


________________________________
Brett Schaefer
Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs
Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy
The Heritage Foundation
214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
Washington, DC 20002
202-608-6097
heritage.org<http://heritage.org/>

__________

On Feb 6, 2016, at 2:56 PM, Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com<mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com>> wrote:

All,

As I have respectfully noted several times, and will reiterate again...the GAC as a whole has taken no position on Rec-1 and Rec-11 and is highly unlikely to do so. There simply is not consensus within the GAC on these issues. The Arasteh/Burr proposal is as close as we're likely to get to a compromise that will not be rejected by any Chartering Org and will be acceptable to NTIA and Congress. This is it. It's time to finalize this work and deliver a proposal to the Chartering Organizations so we can meet the Marrakech deadline for approval.

Regards,
Keith

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 6, 2016, at 2:17 PM, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net<mailto:james at cyberinvasion.net>> wrote:
>
> I have to agree with Andrew on this, this is a topic we can debate for weeks on end. We need to move forward.
>
> -jg
>
>
>
>
>> On 06/02/2016, 6:53 p.m., "accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Andrew Sullivan" <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of ajs at anvilwalrusden.com<mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 09:31:03PM +0000, Perez Galindo, Rafael wrote:
>>>
>>> For that reason, I believe it should be very carefully analyzed and assessed, from an implementing and legal POV. Such a decision cannot be taken in a rush, without considering its consequences and possible side effects.
>>
>> I agree it should be carefully analysed and contemplated, but that
>> analysis and contemplation should take place before the next call not
>> dedicated to Rec. 11 (my calendar seems to think that's Tuesday).
>>
>> The CCWG needs to come to a close and ship something -- even a report
>> out that there's no solution would be better than more delay. There
>> is simply no more time to dither. The transition (or its failure) is
>> waiting on this CCWG's output. The operational communities need to
>> know what their next available range(s) of action will be.
>>
>> Moreover, if the GAC really cannot accept this proposed compromise, it
>> seems at least to me that the hope of any compromise ever being
>> reached is roughly zero. Therefore, the CCWG members should vote on
>> something and move on. I vastly prefer consensus, but in the
>> community where I usually work we would have declared this consensus
>> rough some time ago and closed the discussion.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> A
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Sullivan
>> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com<mailto:ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community<https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community<https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>
>

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community<https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list