[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG - Recommendation 6 - Final Text with Board Compromise Language and Avri's amendment to meeting NTIA criteria

[Greg Shatan]

I think Bruce's language is too vague.  It should be clear that the group
must be chartered by at least two SO/ACs.

Greg

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Dr. Tatiana Tropina <t.tropina at mpicc.de>
wrote:

> Agree with Bruce and Alan (with the idea, the suggested wording might
> need a bit of fine-tuning).
> The broad/neutral language is much more suitable for the bylaw.
> Whether this will be a separate group (doesn't make sense to me
> personally) or a part of broader WS2 group and how it will be chartered
> can be decided later.
> Best regards
> Tatiana
>
> On 09/02/16 10:05, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
> > I suggest replacing the text:
> >
> > “
> > (or another Cross Community Working Group chartered for such purpose by
> one or more Supporting Organizations or Advisory Committees)
> > “
> >
> > With
> >
> > “Or another appropriately chartered, generally/widely supported, cross
> community working group”   as per Alan’s suggestion.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bruce Tonkin
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> > Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160209/67c421d2/attachment.html>