[CCWG-ACCT] Board comments on Board removal in the context of GAC advice
Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au
Sun Feb 14 00:23:35 UTC 2016
Yes that is right León.
From: León Felipe Sánchez Ambía [mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx]
Sent: Sunday, 14 February 2016 6:38 AM
To: Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net>
Cc: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>; Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Board comments on Board removal in the context of GAC advice
As I read it, and please, Bruce, correct me if I’m wrong, this only refers to whole Board removal power and not the rest of community powers so it would leave compromise language intact but clarifying the point in Rec 2 to this end.
> El 13/02/2016, a las 10:17 a.m., Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net> escribió:
> Sent from my iPhone
>> On 13 Feb 2016, at 16:12, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net> wrote:
>> What you are proposing would allow the GAC to participate in that
> Or have I misunderstood? Was your proposed qualification limited only to qualifying Board removal power, not the other community powers?
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community