[CCWG-ACCT] Board comments on Board removal in the context of GAC advice

[Edward Morris]

Thanks for the explanation Bruce. I'm sure we'll be all relieved when this chapter in our lives is done, and we can proceed with things at a more considered pace.

Best,

Ed Morris

Sent from my iPhone

> On 17 Feb 2016, at 21:35, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
> 
> Hello Edward,
> 
> 
>>> Why was the Board unable to provide a response akin to its current proposal prior to the calls where the compromise proposal was accepted by the CCWG? 
> 
> The Board comprises 20 members that also need time to consider a proposal and reach consensus on a view.   The GAC compromise emerged after the Board's last meeting together, and the matter has been considered via the email list since it emerged from the CCWG.   
> 
> There is still an ongoing discussion on the Board mailing list, just like there is on this list.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community