[CCWG-ACCT] Updated Minority Statement for the CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Final Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations
Dr Eberhard W Lisse
epilisse at gmail.com
Thu Feb 18 19:35:55 UTC 2016
Does this constitute an objection?
My understanding is that only objections can be accompanied by a minority opinion.
As the GAC works by consensus, I assume t means the GAC objects.
Given Ms Gross Minority statement It follows she objects.
I have objected formally as well and have sent a Minority Statement.
Can the Co-Chairs please declare non-consensus so we can all get on with our lives?
Not only would it be cost saving...
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 6s
On 18 Feb 2016, 18:40 +0200, Olga Cavalli<olgacavalli at gmail.com>, wrote:
> Dear Co-chairs,
> As a member of the CCWG on Accountability appointed by the GAC, and on behalf of the governments of:
> I am submitting an updated verision of the Minority Statement which I sent yesterday.
> Please consider the document attached to this email as the new updated version, which replaces the previous one. I have also attached a pdf version.
> Please confirm the reception of this message and its attached documents.
> If you have any doubts please let me know.
> Best regards
> Olga Cavalli
> Argentina GAC Representative
> GAC Vicechair
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community