[CCWG-ACCT] Updated Minority Statement for the CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Final Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations

Dr Eberhard W Lisse epilisse at gmail.com
Thu Feb 18 19:35:55 UTC 2016

Does this constitute an objection?

My understanding is that only objections can be accompanied by a minority opinion.

As the GAC works by consensus, I assume t means the GAC objects.

Given Ms Gross Minority statement It follows she objects.

I have objected formally as well and have sent a Minority Statement.

Can the Co-Chairs please declare non-consensus so we can all get on with our lives?

Not only would it be cost saving...


Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 6s

On 18 Feb 2016, 18:40 +0200, Olga Cavalli<olgacavalli at gmail.com>, wrote:
> Dear Co-chairs,
> As a member of the CCWG on Accountability appointed by the GAC, and on behalf of the governments of:
> Argentina
> Brazil
> Chile
> France
> Paraguay
> Peru
> Portugal
> Uruguay
> Venezuela
> I am submitting an updated verision of the Minority Statement which I sent yesterday.
> Please consider the document attached to this email as the new updated version, which replaces the previous one. I have also attached a pdf version.
> Please confirm the reception of this message and its attached documents.
> If you have any doubts please let me know.
> Best regards
> Olga Cavalli
> Argentina GAC Representative
> GAC Vicechair
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160218/f3618f1f/attachment.html>

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list