[CCWG-ACCT] report and next steps

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Fri Feb 19 16:51:39 UTC 2016


Dear Brett,
Pls be kind and observe the ethic.of communication
This is not a correct  to say in an e-mail to others

Quote

"*The only one getting wound up here is you. I suggest you take a breath
and focus on other matters for an hour or so*".

Unquote

If you wish I can reply you in the same manner as you did.

It is Friday and I wish you a very Niced Week-end

Regards

Kavouss





2016-02-19 17:24 GMT+01:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:

> Dear All
> I am not responsible to make any statistic on the issue.
> However, I have seen messages from Russia, Benin and Mali expressing
> support.
> However,I am not here to judge any thing but just draw your attention to
> the natter.
> Pls ask others to comment and not me
> Tks
> Kavouss
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 19 Feb 2016, at 17:14, Phil Corwin <psc at vlaw-dc.com> wrote:
>
> I note that Iran did not endorse the statement -- and would be interested
> in knowing whether it was not asked, or was asked and declined.
>
>
>
> *Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal*
>
> *Virtualaw LLC*
>
> *1155 F Street, NW*
>
> *Suite 1050*
>
> *Washington, DC 20004*
>
> *202-559-8597 <202-559-8597>/Direct*
>
> *202-559-8750 <202-559-8750>/Fax*
>
> *202-255-6172 <202-255-6172>/cell*
>
>
>
> *Twitter: @VlawDC*
>
>
>
> *"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey*
>
>
>
> *From:* accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [
> mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
> <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Paul
> Rosenzweig
> *Sent:* Friday, February 19, 2016 11:06 AM
> *To:* 'Kavouss Arasteh'
> *Cc:* 'Thomas Rickert'; 'Accountability Cross Community'
> *Subject:* Re: [CCWG-ACCT] report and next steps
>
>
>
> Dear Kavous
>
>
>
> Just so we are clear – so what?  There are thousands of people who have
> never attended the CCWG calls.  More or less having failed to do so is on
> them ….
>
>
>
> In any event here is the list of people who joined Olga’s statement,
> annotated
>
>
>
> Argentina – attended CCWG and filed comments
>
> Brazil --  attended CCWG and filed comments
>
> Chile
>
> France – filed comments
>
> Paraguay
>
> Peru
>
> Portugal – attended CCWG and filed comments
>
> Uruguay
>
> Venezuela
>
>
>
> So, essentially, you are arguing that because 5 countries have now joined
> a position held by 4 others we should take note or reopen the discussion.
> We should not.  They are free to express disappointment in solidarity with
> their colleagues if they like, but it doesn’t change the process or the
> result.
>
>
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> Paul Rosenzweig
>
> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
> <paul.rosenzweigesq at redbranchconsulting.com>
>
> O: +1 (202) 547-0660
>
> M: +1 (202) 329-9650
>
> VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
>
> Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
>
> Link to my PGP Key
> <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19&Itemid=9>
>
> <image001.png>
> <http://www.rsaconference.com/events/us16?utm_source=signature&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=speakers-us2016>
>
>
>
> *From:* Kavouss Arasteh [mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
> <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>]
> *Sent:* Friday, February 19, 2016 10:30 AM
> *To:* Paul Rosenzweig <paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com>
> *Cc:* Schaefer, Brett <Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org>; Thomas Rickert <
> thomas at rickert.net>; Accountability Cross Community <
> accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [CCWG-ACCT] report and next steps
>
>
>
> Dear Brett
>
> I am not making any attempt. I have just drawing attention to the concerns
> expressed by these countries some of which never attended CCWG calls .
>
> Take it as it is and please do not accuse me to reopening any thing at all
>
> The issue is there
>
> Regards
>
> Kavousd
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On 19 Feb 2016, at 15:37, Paul Rosenzweig <
> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Kavous
>
>
>
> Theres is not “growing” concern.  These same countries were all quite
> vocal earlier, both in the CCWG and in their public comments.  Their view
> has not prevailed.  If it had, then then the gNSO would have rejected the
> proposal
>
>
>
> Your attempts to reopen settled decisions by portraying old information as
> new are, frankly, illegitimate and disturbing.
>
>
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> Paul Rosenzweig
>
> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
> <paul.rosenzweigesq at redbranchconsulting.com>
>
> O: +1 (202) 547-0660
>
> M: +1 (202) 329-9650
>
> VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
>
> Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
>
> Link to my PGP Key
> <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19&Itemid=9>
>
> <image001.png>
> <http://www.rsaconference.com/events/us16?utm_source=signature&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=speakers-us2016>
>
>
>
> *From:* Kavouss Arasteh [mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
> <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>]
> *Sent:* Friday, February 19, 2016 9:31 AM
> *To:* Schaefer, Brett <Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org>
> *Cc:* Thomas Rickert <thomas at rickert.net>; Accountability Cross Community
> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [CCWG-ACCT] report and next steps
>
>
>
> Dear Brett
>
> Pls DO NOT make any interpretation of my message.
>
> I just informed of the growing concerns tabled
>
> That is all
>
> Regards
>
> Ksvousd
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On 19 Feb 2016, at 15:17, Schaefer, Brett <Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org>
> wrote:
>
> Kavouss,
>
>
>
> So that means that over 130 governments declined to join or support that
> statement in whole or in part?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Brett
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *Brett* *Schaefer*
>
> * Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs
> Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National Security
> and Foreign Policy*
> The Heritage Foundation
> 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
> Washington, DC 20002
> 202-608-6097
> heritage.org
>
> *From:* accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [
> mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
> <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Kavouss
> Arasteh
> *Sent:* Friday, February 19, 2016 8:26 AM
> *To:* Thomas Rickert
> *Cc:* Accountability Cross Community
> *Subject:* Re: [CCWG-ACCT] report and next steps
>
>
>
> Dear Thomas,
>
> After the Minority Statement posted by Olga as a Member of CCWG who is
> eligible to make such statement ,10 more GAC directly or indirectly joined
> joined / supported that statement.This is an important development of the
> serious concerns tabled in regard with ST18, threshold for the GAC advice
> rejection by Board and more importantly Carve-Out concept.
>
> There would therefore a need to reflect in the Report the existence of
> such serious concerns and the increasing supports for the concerns raised
> by Olga.
>
> Some other GAC governments who are not Member of CCWG could probably join
> to the concerns tabled by Olga.
>
> That eventual evolution could also be  mentioned in the report to inform
> other chartering organisation when they receive the REPORT
>
> TKS
>
> KAVOUSD
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On 17 Feb 2016, at 22:09, Thomas Rickert <thomas at rickert.net> wrote:
>
> Dear CCWG-Accountability,
>
>
>
> We wanted to inform you that the revisions have been made from the
> comments that have been received from the lawyers, several community
> members, and from the 16 February call. These have been incorporated into
> the sections that were noted. The graphics are being revised and will be
> placed in the final version of the text per the suggestions that have been
> submitted to date.
>
>
>
> *The revised sections have been posted
> at https://community.icann.org/x/iw2AAw
> <https://community.icann.org/x/iw2AAw> for your final review. We have also
> posted a documents that tracks all the comments — and subsequent
> changes made — between the 12 February and 17 February documents. *
>
>
>
> The schedule presented on the 16 February call that we are following to
> conclude our current work on Work Stream 1 has been updated.
>
>
>
> *12 Feb* — Report sent by 22:00 UTC to the CCWG Leadership Team and CCWG
> Legal Counsel for review with all materials posted on the Wiki (
> https://community.icann.org/x/iw2AAw) for everyone to view.
>
>
>
> *15 Feb* — Report updated (if needed) to incorporate edits from CCWG
> Leadership Team and Legal.
>
>
>
> *17 Feb*— Report sent to CCWG for 48-hour review (and posted on the Wiki
> at https://community.icann.org/x/iw2AAw).
>
> *To ensure that all comments from our CCWG Leadership Team and Legal
> counsel were accurately incorporated for the full group review period,
> distribution to the CCWG was updated to 17 Feb. To maintain the 48-hour
> review period, all subsequent proposal finalization dates have been
> extended one day. All other dates have been retained.*
>
>
>
> *18 Feb at 17:00 UTC *– Minority statements due for incorporation into
> Final Report.
>
>
>
> *19 Feb *– Final Report sent to Chartering Organizations for
> consideration and approval.
>
>
>
> Once the Final Report is in the hands of your organizations, these are the
> expected dates for the final steps, as we discussed on the Transition
> Program Facilitation
> <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/transition-facilitation-2015-09-23-en> call
> this past Tuesday:
>
>
>
> *25 Feb* – CWG-Stewardship sign-off letter delivered to Chartering
> Organizations, then to ICG.
>
>
>
> *By 9 Mar* at the latest – Sign-off on Final Report by Chartering
> Organizations at ICANN55 in Marrakech (in time for the Board to consider).
>
>
>
> *10 Mar* – Public Board Meeting and hand over from ICANN Board to NTIA.
>
>
>
> Based on the updated schedule, minority statements must be submitted no
> later than *18 February at 17:00 UTC *to allow for the final supplemental
> proposal to be produced and ready for distribution to the Chartering
> Organizations on 19 February.
>
>
>
> If you have any questions about our timeline or suggestions for our
> process, please let us know how we can assist.
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Mathieu, León and Thomas
>
> CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
> ------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7303 / Virus Database: 4530/11623 - Release Date: 02/14/16
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160219/3cb4b14b/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list