[CCWG-ACCT] Board position re the GAC carve out

[Alan Greenberg]

+1. In the VERY edge case that we are considering, and the onerous 
implications of removing the Board, I have no problem whatsoever 
requiring unanimity of the remaining AC/SOs.

Alan

At 20/02/2016 12:14 PM, Avri Doria wrote:


>On 19-Feb-16 19:41, Paul Rosenzweig wrote:
> > I suspect to
> > most if not all of the gNSO.
>
>not all. I think Steve's comments were reasonable.
>
>Since it was a compromise I stayed away from the discussion of carves
>out, which have been a somewhat flawed idea from the start in my opinion.
>
>I think making a concession on the unanimity rule in this one case is
>quite reasonable.
>
>
>
>avri
>
>
>
>
>---
>This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>_______________________________________________
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community