[CCWG-ACCT] recap and next steps?
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Sun Feb 21 17:47:11 UTC 2016
At 20/02/2016 11:50 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>I agree, but worry that if too many of us say we will live with whatever
>consensus is reached, we leave it up to the ditch diggers.
>On 21-Feb-16 05:54, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > Dear colleagues,
> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 04:25:15PM +1300, Jordan Carter wrote:
> >> I don't expect that everyone will agree with me that this simply
> isn't that
> >> important an issue, but I really hope that as a CCWG, we can put this
> >> matter into perspective. The CCWG has to come to a conclusion
> on that, and
> >> get the report out.
> > I've been pretty cranky on list about the Board proposal, mostly
> > because I think the arguments so far advanced for it are really weak.
> > But I'm completely in agreement Jordan's note: it is most important to
> > pick an answer and ship the report. In my personal capacity, I'll get
> > behind the decision, whatever it is. Let's choose something and ship.
> > Best regards,
> > A
>This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community