[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG ACCT Proposed Agenda - Call #85 - Tuesday, 23 February @ 06:00 UTC

James Gannon james at cyberinvasion.net
Mon Feb 22 21:03:20 UTC 2016


Kavouss do I understand that you now also wish to reopen the proposal on Fundamental Bylaws?

As per Recommendation 2:

[cid:233689A6-1857-4C10-994B-6435B4F50895]

If so what reasoning is behind reopening yet more consensus based parts of our proposal?

-James

From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com<mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>>
Date: Monday 22 February 2016 at 8:39 p.m.
To: Mathieu Weill <Mathieu.Weill at afnic.fr<mailto:Mathieu.Weill at afnic.fr>>, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx<mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>>, Thomas Rickert <rickert at anwaelte.de<mailto:rickert at anwaelte.de>>
Cc: "accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>" <accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG ACCT Proposed Agenda - Call #85 - Tuesday, 23 February @ 06:00 UTC

Dear Co-Chair,
In view of the extensive exchange of correspondence and divergence views expressed in regard with Paragraph 51 of Recommendation 2 now on advance publication, I formally request the co-chairs to put that paragraph Under Agenda Item 2.
This request has been discussed with colleagues and would have their support.
There should be no fear to discuss such an important item which could contribute to the support of chatering organizations to Rec. 2
Refusal of the co-chairs to do so ,would certainly have adverse affect on the definitive approval / consensus building of this item
Regards
Kavouss

2016-02-22 15:10 GMT+01:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com<mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>>:
Dear Co-Chairs
Item 2 f the agenda is
Substantial discussion on a way forward?

Discussion on what?
Board's Recall threshold  WHEN irp is available and when IRP is not available ( in case of non participation of GAC as results of Carve-Out application )?
Please kindly clarify
Regards
Kavouss
?


2016-02-22 15:01 GMT+01:00 Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer at icann.org<mailto:brenda.brewer at icann.org>>:

Dear All,
In preparation for your call #85<https://community.icann.org/x/QAOAAw> – Tuesday, 23 February 2016 at 06:00 – 08:00 UTC (time converter<http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CCWG+ACCT+Meeting&iso=20160223T06&p1=1440&ah=2>), see below a proposed agenda:

1.      Welcome, Roll call, SoI

2.      Substantive discussion on way forward

3.      AOB
Adobe Connect: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/accountability/

Thank you!
Kind regards,
Brenda


_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160222/62c2cf87/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 233689A6-1857-4C10-994B-6435B4F50895.png
Type: image/png
Size: 34261 bytes
Desc: 233689A6-1857-4C10-994B-6435B4F50895.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160222/62c2cf87/233689A6-1857-4C10-994B-6435B4F50895-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160222/62c2cf87/image001-0001.gif>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list