[CCWG-ACCT] Poll results

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Tue Feb 23 11:29:53 UTC 2016


Dear Thomas,
As I informed Alice ,during the call ,I supported to delete the red text as
well as sending the Report to chartering Organization without that Red text
My Name should be in Poll 2 and Poll 3
I am in Poll 3 but not in Poll 2 .Plerase kindly in clude my name in Poll 2
as well.
Regards
Kavouss



2016-02-23 11:42 GMT+01:00 Thomas Rickert <thomas at rickert.net>:

> Thank you, Kavouss.
>
> We will note that accordingly. Sorry for this!
>
> Thomas
>
> ---
> rickert.net
>
>
> Am 23.02.2016 um 11:37 schrieb Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
> >:
>
> Dear Alice
> Thank you very much
> I was announed three times that my name be included in List 2 .
> Pls kindly do it.
> Regards
> KAVOUSS ARASTEH
>
> 2016-02-23 11:26 GMT+01:00 Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>
>>
>> To ensure full transparency around the polling, the staff have reviewed
>> the recording for the call and crosschecked the results. The Adobe Connect
>> recording is available here for your viewing as well:
>> https://icann.adobeconnect.com/p2ner13u4kd/.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please note that the instructions regarding participation in the polls
>> were as follows:
>>
>> ·      Anyone on the call was invited to participate in the poll
>> (members & participants).
>>
>> ·      To participate, participants in the Adobe Connect room used
>> either a red or green tick to respond to the poll question.
>>
>> ·      Those on audio-only could express their position over the phone.
>>
>> ·      After the polls, analysis would be conducted to assess
>> participation from CCWG members (for the purposes of these results, the
>> members’ names are in bold font).
>>
>>
>>
>> The Chairs conducted four polls in a group that varied between 85-90
>> participants. The text used as the basis for the polls is Paragraph 72 of
>> the CCWG report (see attached slide for the text as well as the 2nd
>> bullet highlighted in red). The first two poll questions were based on
>> objections and the second two poll questions were based on expressions of
>> support.
>>
>>
>> *Summary of results: *
>>
>>
>>
>> ·      11 objections to removing the 2nd bullet in Paragraph 72 (in red
>> on the slide)
>>
>> o   (2 CCWG member objections)
>>
>>
>>
>> ·      27 objections to sending the report forward as it is currently,
>> with the full text in Paragraph 72
>>
>> o   (8 CCWG member objections, including all ALAC members)
>>
>>
>>
>> ·      36 support removing the language in the 2nd bullet in Paragraph
>> 72 (in red on the slide)
>>
>> o   (10 CCWG members supporting)
>>
>>
>>
>> ·      14 support sending the report forward as it is currently, with
>> the full text in Paragraph 72
>>
>> o   (2 CCWG members supporting)
>>
>>
>> *Detailed results: *
>>
>>
>>
>> *Poll #1* – Who objects to removing the 2nd bullet in Paragraph 72 (in
>> red on the slide), (“If the IRP is not available to challenge the Board
>> action in question”)?
>>
>>
>>
>> 1.    Brett Schaefer (NCSG – Participant)
>>
>> 2.    Edward Morris (NCSG – Participant)
>>
>> 3.    Farzaneh Badii (NCSG – Participant)
>>
>> 4.    James Gannon (NCSG – Participant)
>>
>> 5.    Malcolm Hutty (ISPCP – Participant)
>>
>> 6.    Milton Mueller (NCSG – Participant)
>>
>> 7.    Paul Rosenzweig (NCSG – Participant)
>>
>> 8.    *Robin Gross* (NCSG – Member)
>>
>> 9.    Stephen Deerhake (ccNSO – Participant)
>>
>> 10. Tatiana Tropina (NCSG – Participant)
>>
>> 11. *Eberhard Lisse* (ccNSO – Member)
>>
>>
>>
>> *Poll #2* – Who objects to sending the report forward (to Chartering
>> Organizations) as it is currently, (i.e. the 19 February version with the
>> full text in Paragraph 72)?
>>
>>
>>
>> 1.    *Alan Greenberg* (ALAC – Member)
>>
>> 2.    Asha Hemrajani (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 3.    Cherine Chalaby (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 4.    *Cheryl Langdon-Orr* (ALAC – Member)
>>
>> 5.    Chris Disspain (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 6.    David McAuley (GNSO – Participant)
>>
>> 7.    Fadi Chehade (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 8.    George Sadowsky (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 9.    Jorge Cancio (GAC – Participant)
>>
>> 10. *Julia Wolman* (GAC – Member)
>>
>> 11. Keith Drazek (RySG – Participant)
>>
>> 12. *Leon Sanchez* (ALAC – Member)
>>
>> 13. Lito Ibarra (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 14. Louisewies Van del Laan (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 15. Markus Kummer (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 16. *Olga Cavalli* (GAC – Member)
>>
>> 17. Olivier Crepin-Leblond (ALAC – Participant)
>>
>> 18. Pedro da Silva (GAC – Participant)
>>
>> 19. Rafael Perez Galindo (GAC – Participant)
>>
>> 20. Rinalia Abdul Rahim (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 21. *Roelof Meijer* (ccNSO – Member)
>>
>> 22. Ron da Silva (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 23. Samantha Eisner (ICANN Staff Liaison)
>>
>> 24. Seun Ojedeji (ALAC – Participant)
>>
>> 25. Steve Crocker (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 26. *Sebastien Bachollet* (ALAC – Member)
>>
>> 27. Stephen Deerhake (ccNSO – Participant)
>>
>> 28. Tarek Kamel (ICANN Staff – Participant)
>>
>> 29. *Tijani Ben Jemaa* (ALAC – Member)
>>
>>
>>
>> *Poll #3* – Who supports removing the language in the 2nd bullet in
>> Paragraph 72 (in red on the slide), (“If the IRP is not available to
>> challenge the Board action in question”)?
>>
>>
>>
>> 1.    *Alan* *Greenberg* (ALAC – Member)
>>
>> 2.    Annaliese Williams (GAC – Participant)
>>
>> 3.    Asha Hemrajani (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 4.    Avri Doria (NCSG – Participant)
>>
>> 5.    Cherine Chalaby (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 6.    *Cheryl Langdon-Orr* (ALAC – Member)
>>
>> 7.    Chris Disspain (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 8.    David McAuley (GNSO – Participant)
>>
>> 9.    Fadi Chehade (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 10. Finn Petersen (GAC – Participant)
>>
>> 11. George Sadowsky (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 12. Greg Shatan (IPC – Participant)
>>
>> 13. *James Bladel* (RrSG – Member)
>>
>> 14. *Julia* *Wolman* (GAC – Member)
>>
>> 15. Kavouss Arasteh (GAC – Participant)
>>
>> 16. Keith Drazek (RySG – Participant)
>>
>> 17. *Leon* *Sanchez* (ALAC – Member)
>>
>> 18. Lito Ibarra (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 19. Louisewies Van del Laan (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 20. Mark Carvell (GAC – Participant)
>>
>> 21. Markus Kummer (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 22. Mary Uduma (ccNSO – Participant)
>>
>> 23. Niels Ten Oever (Participant)
>>
>> 30. *Olga* *Cavalli* (GAC – Member)
>>
>> 24. Olivier Crepin-Leblond (ALAC – Participant)
>>
>> 25. Paul Szyndler (ccNSO – Participant)
>>
>> 26. Pedro da Silva (GAC – Participant)
>>
>> 31. Rafael Perez Galindo (GAC – Participant)
>>
>> 27. Rinalia Abdul Rahim (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 28. *Roelof* *Meijer* (ccNSO – Member)
>>
>> 29. Ron da Silva (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 30. Sabine Meyer (GAC – Participant)
>>
>> 31. Seun Ojedeji (ALAC – Participant)
>>
>> 32. Steve Crocker (ICANN Board – Participant)
>>
>> 33. *Steve DelBianco* (CSG – Member)
>>
>> 34. *Sebastien* *Bachollet* (ALAC – Member)
>>
>> 35. Tarek Kamel (ICANN Staff)
>>
>> 36. *Tijani* *Ben Jemaa* (ALAC – Member)
>>
>>
>>
>> *Poll #4* – Who supports sending the report to Chartering Organizations
>> as it is currently, (i.e. the 19 February version with the full text in
>> Paragraph 72)?
>>
>>
>>
>> 1.    Aarti Bhavana (NCSG – Participant)
>>
>> 2.    Brett Schaefer (NCSG – Participant)
>>
>> 3.    Edward Morris (NCSG – Participant)
>>
>> 4.    Farzaneh Badii (NCSG – Participant)
>>
>> 5.    James Gannon (NCSG – Participant)
>>
>> 6.    *Jordan Carter* (ccNSO – Member)
>>
>> 7.    Martin Boyle (ccNSO – Participant)
>>
>> 8.    Matthew Shears (NCSG – Participant)
>>
>> 9.    Malcolm Hutty (ISPCP – Participant)
>>
>> 10. Milton Mueller (NCSG – Participant)
>>
>> 11. Paul Rosenzweig (NCSG – Participant)
>>
>> 12. *Robin* *Gross* (NCSG – Member)
>>
>> 13. Stephen Deerhake (ccNSO – Participant)
>>
>> 14. Tatiana Tropina (NCSG – Participant)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160223/fbf8dfe8/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list