[CCWG-ACCT] Poll results
kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Tue Feb 23 13:18:15 UTC 2016
I support the participation of the Board's membrés as participants of CCWG
.Why they should be excluded.
ONCE AGAIN PARTICIPANTS ARE THOSE WHO ARE NOT FORMAL MEMBERS OF CCWG
2016-02-23 13:30 GMT+01:00 Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net>:
> I do not speak to the merits of the Board's objection. There may be
> something of a point (or there may not).
> But procedurally, it is very unfortunate.
> The Board should consider whether it really wants to sink the ship over a
> ha'porth of tar.
> On 23/02/16 12:25, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>> So have your colleagues on the Board pull their objection.
>> On 2016-02-23 14:16, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" wrote:
>>> My only recommendation to all parties is please, be flexible enough
>>> to find a fair compromise to enable moving forward. You have agreed
>>> 99 %. It would be a shame if in the last minute a remaining
>>> controversial issue blocks the historical agreement.
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community