[CCWG-ACCT] Poll results

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Tue Feb 23 13:18:15 UTC 2016


I support the participation of the Board's membrés as participants of CCWG
.Why they should be excluded.
ONCE AGAIN PARTICIPANTS ARE THOSE WHO ARE NOT FORMAL MEMBERS OF CCWG
Regards
Kavouss

2016-02-23 13:30 GMT+01:00 Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net>:

> I do not speak to the merits of the Board's objection. There may be
> something of a point (or there may not).
>
> But procedurally, it is very unfortunate.
>
> The Board should consider whether it really wants to sink the ship over a
> ha'porth of tar.
>
>
>
>
> On 23/02/16 12:25, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>
>> So have your colleagues on the Board pull their objection.
>>
>>
>> el
>>
>> On 2016-02-23 14:16, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" wrote:
>>
>>> My only recommendation to all parties is please, be flexible enough
>>> to find a fair compromise to enable moving forward.  You have agreed
>>> 99 %.  It would be a shame if in the last minute a remaining
>>> controversial issue blocks the historical agreement.
>>>
>>> Wolfgang
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160223/0de3c302/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list