[CCWG-ACCT] Poll results

[Edward Morris]

Disagree.
  
 There are formal requirements for participating in the CCWG. Members 
notify the secretariat. They must have a SOI on file. They are then listed 
as a participant on our website with links to their SOI. It's a minimal 
requirement, but a necessary one if we are to be a truly responsive and 
transparent organisation.
  
 Part of what's going on here is a bit of a culture class, between the old 
backscratching 'we all know each other' world of internet governance and, 
as Avri correctly put it, the more "formalistic" approach. This is not a 
hobby, it is a multimillion-dollar international corporation. Fadi did a 
fantastic job of professionalising the management of this company. If this 
corporation is to be granted independence the community needs to make 
similar progress.
  
 There are rules and procedures and they need to be respected. If not, next 
poll you can expect me to invite 1,500 of my nearest and dearest Facebook 
friends to the meeting. Actually, no, because I respect the process too 
much to do that but if the stakes are high enough  eventually someone will. 
Then what?
  
 Best,
  
 Ed Morris
  
  
  

----------------------------------------
 From: "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 1:05 PM
To: "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org>
Cc: "accountability-cross-community at icann.org" 
<accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Poll results   
  Dear All,
 Once again ,some distinguished colleagues started to open another heavy 
and extensive correspondence in regard with " participants" .Who ever 
attending a call and is not formal Member appointed by chatering 
organizations is PARTICIPANT.
 Dear Co-Chair pls rule out such an unneccessary discussions
 Regards
 Kavouss

   2016-02-23 13:50 GMT+01:00 Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>:  
me too

i also feel sorry for chairs

avri

On 23-Feb-16 14:41, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> Thank you very much for your efforts.
> I SUPPORT CHAIRS
> Kavouss
>
> 2016-02-23 13:32 GMT+01:00 Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.na
> <mailto:el at lisse.na>>:
>
>     In my usual civil way:
>
>     The Co-Chairs have lost control. Or given it away.
>
>     el
>
>
>     On 2016-02-23 13:38, Nigel Roberts wrote:
>     [...]
>     > Now, please, what does it mean?
>     [...]
>     _______________________________________________
>     Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>     Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>     <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
   _______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160223/d2ba40aa/attachment.html>