[CCWG-ACCT] Poll results
Dr Eberhard W Lisse
el at lisse.NA
Tue Feb 23 14:44:01 UTC 2016
I didn't mean the poll, I meant the Board Objection cum Minority
Opinion and Resolution that gave rise to this.
With regards to your other messages, I believe that process matters.
First of all the Board (and Staff) should not have polled in the CCWG
on this issue created by the Board.
Secondly that two Board Members (one of them the CEO) do not register
as Participant but nevertheless poll as Participants bothers me on
Thirdly this is now the second time that we had Consensus on something
and a small fraction changes that for us. That bothers me. And not
only on principle.
On 2016-02-23 16:07, Roelof Meijer wrote:
> Check the poll results, it¹s not the board. CCWG members are
> objecting to the inclusion of section (2).
> I am offering theory nor explanation, but strangely enough, most of
> those not objecting to its inclusion are (NCSG) participants, not
> members of the CCWG
> On 23-02-16 13:25, "accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on
> behalf of Dr Eberhard W Lisse"
> <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on behalf of
> el at lisse.na> wrote:
>> So have your colleagues on the Board pull their objection.
>> On 2016-02-23 14:16, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" wrote:
>>> My only recommendation to all parties is please, be flexible enough
>>> to find a fair compromise to enable moving forward. You have agreed
>>> 99 %. It would be a shame if in the last minute a remaining
>>> controversial issue blocks the historical agreement.
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421 \ /
Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community