[CCWG-ACCT] poll result and next steps

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Colleagues

If you have any problem on how «Broad Support» should be defined, please
address yourself to NTIA.

These term WAS FIRST used in their announcement of 14 March 2014 regarding
the transition of IANA Function Stewardship.

CCWG is not a Cross Community Vocabulary Working Group.

Regards

Kavouss

2016-02-23 21:02 GMT+01:00 <epilisse at gmail.com>:

> Dear Co-Chairs,
>
> there is no definition of "broad support" and under the Charter the only
> options are "Full Consensus", "Consensus" (and of course "No Consensus").
>
> Please advise by when (updated) Minority Statements are due.
>
> I assume you are also dispensing with Public Comment?
>
> el
>
> --
> Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad 4 mini
>
> On 23 Feb 2016, 20:15 +0200, Thomas Rickert <thomas at rickert.net>, wrote:
>
> [...].
>
>
>
> We have now taken a look at the outcome of the poll and confirm that -
> focusing on members and participants only and focusing on members in
> particular - we have broad support for removal of the language in (2).
>
> [...]
>
> *We will now proceed and send the finalized report, without (2), to the
> Chartering Organizations for approval.*
>
>  [...]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160223/0af81ebf/attachment-0001.html>