[CCWG-ACCT] Request for Clarification on Threshold Issue
nigel at channelisles.net
Mon Feb 29 22:31:54 UTC 2016
Then shouldn't we stop with the post facto relitigation?
Or as our American colleagues put it: "Monday morning quarterbacking".
On 29/02/16 21:58, Thomas Rickert wrote:
> Hi Nigel.
>> "Does the Draft Final Report that was transmitted to the COs several days ago accurately represent the agreed work product of the CCWG?"
>> That question has a binary answer.
> The answer is yes.
>> It seems to me that discussion continues on further modifications or amendment to it.
>> Is my understanding correct?
>> On 29/02/16 18:39, Salaets, Ken wrote:
>>> r now, perhaps the previous vote should be revisited.
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community