[CCWG-ACCT] On behalf of Co-Chairs - Public comment summary/analysis
mshears at cdt.org
Wed Jan 6 16:56:19 UTC 2016
Very helpful collation/summary.
One small edit on CDT's input. On rec. 1 col. G could you replace the
words Sole Member with Sole Designator (CDT supported the Sole Member
but is comfortable supporting the Sole Designator model in the proposal).
On 06/01/2016 16:44, Schaefer, Brett wrote:
> Thank you for this. The Heritage Foundation’s opposition to full GAC
> participation in the empowered community was not noted in the Rec 1
> analysis. As stated in our comment, we think that GAC should be
> strictly advisory.
> On Rec 7 analysis, I’m concerned that our position may be
> misunderstood. We support including DIDP in an appeals process, but we
> are very much against restricting it to the engagement, escalation,
> and enforcement staircase because that process is dependent on the
> Empowered Community. DIDP appeals need to be accessible to everyone,
> not just the SOACs, and appeals should not require SOAC approval at
> any threshold. This may require moving DIDP appeals to the request for
> reconsideration process.
> On Rec 11, the one sentence summary gives the impression that we
> support Rec 11. We do not and offered specific proposals on how to
> change the text to address our concerns, which were not included in
> the Rec 11 analysis.
> Best wishes,
> Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs
> Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National
> Security and Foreign Policy
> The Heritage Foundation
> 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
> Washington, DC 20002
> heritage.org <http://heritage.org/>
> *From:*accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Alice Jansen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 06, 2016 9:04 AM
> *To:* accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> *Subject:* [CCWG-ACCT] On behalf of Co-Chairs - Public comment
> _On behalf of CCWG-ACCT Co-Chairs_
> Dear all,
> Attached to this email you will find a staff produced summary and
> analysis of the public comments received on our Draft Proposal.
> In preparation for our January discussions, we encourage you to read
> the document as well as comments available for full reference at:
> Note: a /download all/ page is available at
> Please note that we cannot convert the spreadsheet into a PDF, the
> tabs and spreadsheet being too large. Thank you for your understanding.
> Staff will post the summary on the public forum box on Friday, 8
> January -
> In the meantime, it is located on your wiki at
> Thank you
> Best regards
> Mathieu, Thomas, León
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
Director - Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology
mshears at cdt.org
+ 44 771 247 2987
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community