[CCWG-ACCT] Deck for Meeting #75 Mission Statement discussion
Becky.Burr at neustar.biz
Fri Jan 8 17:29:43 UTC 2016
I think we need to acknowledge that folks will come out differently on
this question - but that is TOTALLY to be expected. Avri thinks the
NetMundial Initiative is in scope, Milton thinks it isn¹t. The test is
still the same - is it consistent with and reasonably necessary to ensure
the stability and security of the DNS?
J. Beckwith Burr
Neustar, Inc. / Deputy
General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington D.C. 20006
Office: +1.202.533.2932 Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 / neustar.biz
On 1/8/16, 11:34 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>Except that ICANN's work and the environment it is done within was
>indeed part of what was considered by NETmundial.
>I know that for many, NET mundial was the origin of the objection about
>ICANN overstepping its mission. I never believed that and believe that
>it was an important event and within mission for ICANN to have done. I
>think changing the mission so as to exclude ICANN particpation and
>suppport for such activities would be a mistake and should not be
>included as a Transition goal. How about IGF, should ICANN stop its
>support? Is that a goal?
>I agree we should maintain ICANN's already restricted mission. This is
>what we agreed to. We have not agreed to narrowing its scope as far as
>On 08-Jan-16 11:21, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>> Is floating and sustaining something like the Net Mundial Initiative,
>> whose express purpose is to address public policy issues outside the
>> names and numbers, and technical protocols and coordination, something
>> within ICANN's mandate?
>> My answer: No.
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community