[CCWG-ACCT] Deck for Meeting #75 Mission Statement discussion
avri at acm.org
Fri Jan 8 17:49:34 UTC 2016
On 08-Jan-16 12:25, Burr, Becky wrote:
> Wonder if the right way to look at this is to develop some Stress Tests on
> whether we¹ve changed the test?
I think this might be a good idea. I am sure you are right that there
is a difference between some of the things people say will be excluded
in the post transition mission and those that actually would be.
Perhaps we should test against a set of things that the Board decided
were in scope in the past years and see whether they would still be in
scope with the rewrite.
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community