[CCWG-ACCT] improve working methods for drafting of reports issued in name of CCWG - ACCT
Nigel Roberts
nigel at channelisles.net
Tue Jan 12 18:20:13 UTC 2016
Avri
I am probably being very dull after the end of a long day of doing
figurework, but I really don't quite follow your meaning here.
What exactly is the critical necessity to which you refer?
Having a vague secretive black box, or making sure we don't have one?? I
think it's a bit late for the latter.
Nigel
(Unless Darth Vader is going to take off his helmet, the Empire's will
shall prevail?)
On 12/01/16 18:04, Avri Doria wrote:
>
> This has been discussed several times before.
>
> Due to the impression that nothing has changed after previous
> conversations and we are coming so close to the bitter end, it becomes a
> critical necessity.
>
> avri
>
> On 12-Jan-16 12:57, Nigel Roberts wrote:
>>
>>> .. . .. .. I am simply not
>>> comfortable with this vague secretive "black box" process that removes
>>> decisional authority from the Members.
>>
>> I am genuinely wondering how this has taken so long for other people
>> to realise this.
>>
>>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list