[CCWG-ACCT] Deck for Meeting #75 Mission Statement discussion
Eric (Maule) Brunner-Williams
ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net
Thu Jan 14 18:58:35 UTC 2016
Our notes crossed paths.
> All of those commitments, by virtue of their inclusion in the application,
> are enforceable by ICANN. But say that the applicant decides to abandon
> the disclosure requirement and disbands the stakeholder council.
Lets change one part of the hypo, the applicant (subsequent to approval)
decides to abandon a different requirement -- the one that requires the
executive staff not to be completely comprised of crooks.
The vetting of the applicant executive management serves one or more of
the goals of openness, interoperability, resilience, security and/or
stability of the DNS.
Which commitments, made within the contract, are unnecessary to enforce,
and which are necessary to enforce?
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community