[CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 6 - Human Rights - 1st reading conclusions

[Nigel Roberts]

Or to put it another way,

to have our minds changed for us.



On 18/01/16 10:09, Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch wrote:
> Dear all
>
> I agree. It would be tantamount to forgetting the hard work and long
> discussions had in WP4.
>
> Regards
>
> Jorge
>
> *Von:*accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] *Im Auftrag
> von * Dr. Tatiana Tropina
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 18. Januar 2016 11:00
> *An:* accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> *Betreff:* Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 6 - Human Rights - 1st reading
> conclusions
>
> Dear all,
> Sorry I found that I missed an important word in my previous email and
> think this can lead to misunderstanding.
> I meant there was "NO real dialogue" on consumer trust outside of the
> new gTLD discussions, while HR have been discussed extensively at WP4
> and CCWG.
> Thus, we can't compare consumer trust and HR as re what shall be moved
> to WS2 completely.
> Best
> Tatiana
>
> On 18/01/16 10:45, Dr. Tatiana Tropina wrote:
>
>     Dear Paul,
>     To answer your question
>
>     On 18/01/16 08:57, Paul Szyndler wrote:
>
>         Further, what distinguishes the conversation of human rights
>         from our recent discussion on consumer trust?
>
>     The difference is, as it was pointed in the thread on "Christmas
>     Trees and Consumer Trust", that human rights have been extensively
>     discussed during the preparation of the Third Draft Proposal at the
>     WP4 and CCWG, while there has been a real dialogue on consumer trust
>     outside of the new gTLD review discussions.
>     I think comparing human rights issues and implications to the
>     discussion on consumer trust is not feasible - neither in the
>     context of this group nor in the broader context. WP4 has achieved
>     its a compromise and suggested the bylaw language after extensive
>     discussions, so moving the issue of human rights completely to WS2
>     is not justified - at least not if one uses comparison with consumer
>     trust issues for such justification.
>     Best regards
>     Tatiana
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>
>     Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org  <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>