[CCWG-ACCT] DOCUMENT - Rec 11 - GAC Advice (first reading)

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Mon Jan 18 17:11:12 UTC 2016


Dear All,
I  WE COULD QUICKLY AND SIMPLY RESOLVE 7 ADDRESS THE ISSUE I  HAVE NO
PROBLEM
GAC had always provided such reasons/ Rationale..
My anxiety is we strat a big round of discussions among those who are so
knoweedgeable in evry and all areas that we may not get out of it.
Regards
Kavouss


2016-01-18 18:03 GMT+01:00 Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net>:

> I concur with Steve. This is a very important *requirement*. Not only did
> it have broad support during the public comment period but it's simple
> common sense: for advice to have any value to the Board the reasoning
> behind the advice needs to be provided. A simple "we don't like it" is of
> little value, although if provided as a rationale the lack of depth of the
> reasoning  would perhaps speak for itself. I view this as a part of the
> greater transparency we are striving for in all things ICANN.
>
> Ed Morris
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From*: "Steve DelBianco" <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>
> *Sent*: Monday, January 18, 2016 4:36 PM
> *To*: "Mathieu Weill" <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>, "Greg Shatan" <
> gregshatanipc at gmail.com>, "Chartier, Mike S" <mike.s.chartier at intel.com>
>
> *Cc*: "accountability-cross-community at icann.org" <
> accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> *Subject*: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] DOCUMENT - Rec 11 - GAC Advice (first reading)
>
> Mathieu —  Regarding formal advice from any Advisory Committee (AC), many
> commenters reiterated that a rationale should be a *requirement* for
> advice to be considered by the board.   (BC, NPOC, Google, USCIB, RySG,
> Valideus, the US Chamber, RrSG, NCUC, I2C, Intel, IPC)
>
> It’s not enough to require that each AC "will make every effort”.
>
>
>
>
> From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of
> Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>
> Date: Monday, January 18, 2016 at 3:10 AM
> To: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>, Mike Chartier <
> mike.s.chartier at intel.com>
> Cc: "accountability-cross-community at icann.org" <
> accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] DOCUMENT - Rec 11 - GAC Advice (first reading)
>
>
> Mike,
>
>
>
> Good catch indeed. Precisely the point of our first reading exercise.
>
>
>
> So we will add this to recommendation 11 agenda item tomorrow.
>
>
>
> I will note that the current annex includes a related recommendation :
>
> ·         Insert a mention for all ACs: “The AC will make every effort to
> ensure that the advice provided is clear and supported by a rationale.”
>
> Best,
>
> Mathieu
>
>
>
> *De :* accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [
> mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
> <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>] *De la part de* Greg
> Shatan
> *Envoyé :* lundi 18 janvier 2016 05:30
> *À :* Chartier, Mike S
> *Cc :* accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> *Objet :* Re: [CCWG-ACCT] DOCUMENT - Rec 11 - GAC Advice (first reading)
>
>
>
> Mike,
>
>
>
> Good point and good catch.  This should not have been overlooked.
>
>
>
> Greg
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Chartier, Mike S <
> mike.s.chartier at intel.com> wrote:
>
> I think this is another illustration of how we need to be careful in
> documenting the process for handling comments (other than the Boards). For
> Recommendation 11 several commenters offered the proposal to add a
> requirement for GAC advice to be accompanied by a rationale. Given the
> general acceptance of proposals for rationales in other areas, I would have
> thought it would have at least been given a note in the prep document.
>
> Look forward to discussing on Tues.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Alice
> Jansen
> *Sent:* Friday, January 15, 2016 12:01 PM
> *To:* accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> *Subject:* [CCWG-ACCT] DOCUMENT - Rec 11 - GAC Advice (first reading)
>
>
>
> *Sent on behalf of CCWG-ACCT Co-Chairs*
>
>
>
> In preparation for your R*ecommendation 11 – GAC Advice (first reading)* discussion
> scheduled for your call #78 - Tuesday, 19 January 2016 (12:00 – 15:00
> UTC) - please find attached the material to review.
>
> Please use this email thread to circulate any comments you may have in
> advance of the call.
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
> Mathieu, Thomas, León
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160118/dbbe395d/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list